Sunday, February 7, 2010

Social Engineering: A science behind major Corporate Attacks

All social engineering techniques are usually based on specific attributes of human decision-making known as cognitive biases. These biases, sometimes called "bugs in the human hardware," which can be exploited in various combinations to create attack techniques. Source: "Wikipedia".

Social Engineering misdirection takes advantage of the limits of the human mind in order to give the wrong picture and memory. The mind can concentrate on only one thing at a time. The magician uses this to manipulate the "victim's" idea of how the world is supposed to be.

Common Risks From Social Engineering
–Direct users to malware attack
–Trick users into executing malware
–Persuade users into handing the information (data leakage)

Past Recaps:
Nigeria 419 scams, since 1980s
Phishing at AOL users
-AOL's chat rooms have been awash in password-stealing since at least 1994.
-In one three-month period in 1996, AOL cancelled 370,000 accounts for "creditcard fraud, hacking, etc "Washington post".

Other Email Scams Since 90s
Changes In The Social Engineering Attacks

Internet Statistics (1990-2008)
-Online presence1,463,632,361 –Internet users worldwide (June 2008).
-1.3 billion–email users worldwide. 210 billion emails sent per day (2008).
-Web Sites: 186,727,854–in December 2008. 31.5 million added during 2008.

Targeting Users for your Attack?
Using Popular Search Terms
Using celebrities popularity
Cyber attackers use Terrorist tactics
Terrorist cells are increasingly looking at less well-protected "soft" targets where Westerners can be found, such as social and retailvenues, tourist sites and transport networks (rail, road and airports), as illustrated by the attacks in Bali in October 2002,Madrid in March 2004 and Egypt in July 2005.

Business Strategies?

77% of employees have a Facebook account.
2/3rd access during working hours for average 15mins per day.
87% couldn’t define a clear business reason.
1 in 33 built and manage their entire profile at work.
1.47% total lost productivity across entire employee population.

Common issues with social networking

Who are you really communicating with?
–Has their account been compromised?
–Has the provider of the tool/service been compromised?
–Has the content been tampered?
–Does it have an abbreviated URL?

Stopping users getting to the compromised sites
–Content filtering: Needs real time intelligence.

Ensuring users don’t self infect
–Anti-malware solution
–Control what users can execute: User Access Control (Microsoft), Whitelistingtools (apple model - Digitally signed applications, 3rd party whitelisting tools) -Behavioural controls (IPS, FW, etc): Harden OS, Control what can be installed, used, interacted with other resources.
-Data leakage: Education, Data Loss Prevention controls (DRM).

Digital Reputation - Risk Management
Monitoring and controlling Social Networking Usage
-56% of employers admit to monitoring employees to see if accessing on-line social networking sites, amongst others things.
-38% block employees from accessing such websites.
-1/3rd of employers have adopted policies limiting or prohibiting use of such sites during work time.
-6% have terminated employees for utilizing online social networking sites during work.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

CyberWar, CyberTerror and CyberCrime

During the past few years, these terms have refined and brought enormous attention in the media. However, the actual definitions remain same but keep blending with the growing threats.

As mentioned in Wikipedia:

CyberWar - Also known as "Cyber Warfare", is the use of computers and the Internet in conducting warfare in cyberspace.

CyberTerror - Cyberterrorism is a controversial term. The premeditated use of disruptive activities, or the threat thereof, against computers and/or networks, with the intention to cause harm or further social, ideological, religious, political or similar objectives Or to intimidate any person in furtherance of such objectives.

CyberCrime - Computer crime encompass a broad range of potentially illegal activities. This involves, crimes that target computer networks or devices directly or crimes facilitated by computer networks or devices, the primary target of which is independent of the computer network or device.

Now, I am going to point some of the key facts and their associated conflicts in dimension with cyber warfare.

-Distributed attacks, high anonymity.
-Possibility to use the same enemy’s infrastructures.
-Low cost of technology implementation and R&D.
-Wide range of critical infrastructures to be attacked.
-Possibility to carry out unconventional activities.
-Direct contact with the enemy’s command and control center at the highest ranks.

Evaluation#1:
In the traditional wars, to fight a country it requires a huge amount of resources (weapons, ammunition, etc). While, in asymmetric Internet based conflicts, to fight a country it can take just a few or just one motivated skilled hacker.

Cyber Politics (Historical track-record)
2001 Pakistan vs West
2002 USA vs China
2004 South America vs USA
2007 Arab countries vs Denmark
2007 Russia vs Estonia
2008 Russia vs Georgia

Cyber Industrial and Private Espionage
2001 Pakistan vs India
2005 China vs EU (political)
2005 China vs Italy (industrial)
2006 Russia vs USA (militar)
2008 China vs rest of the world
2009 China vs USA (preemptive war?)


Evaluation#2:
-The tactical systems were downloading nothing most of the time and when they were downloading they downloaded irrealistic data.
-The system was so slow in distributing the intelligence that we knew about the enemy presence only when it was in front of us and shooting.
-Too much of intelligence = No intelligence!

Lessons Never Learned
-Germany (Parliament law against security/hacking tools).
-France (Sarkozy doctrine).
-Italy (Pisanu decree).
-Sweden (The Pirate Bay case).
-All other countries (Blindness towards multi-layered threats and blindness towards excessive data retention).

Lessons Learned
-Use proprietary software and hardware when possible. And when it is not possible, use at least well reviewed open sourced software.
-Excessive data retention causes more troubles than benefits. There is a hidden danger from the social point of view as once adopted and enforced a data retentive policy, it will take a revolution to take it down (remember the London airport case?).




Durante los últimos años, estos términos han estado referidos y llamando la atención de los medios. Sin embargo, las definiciones actuales siguen siendo iguales, y se mantienen con las crecientes amenazas.

Según Wikipedia:

CyberWar (Ciber-Guerra): También conocido como "Cyber Warfare", es el uso de las computadoras y el internet para realizar la guerra en el ciberespacio.

CyberTerror – Cyberterrorism: el ciberterrorismo o terrorismo electrónico es el uso de medios de tecnologías de información, comunicación, informática, electrónica o similar con el propósito de generar terror o miedo generalizado en una población, clase dirigente o gobierno, causando con ello una violencia a la libre voluntad de las personas. Los fines pueden ser económicos, políticos o religiosos principalmente.

CyberCrime (CiberCrimen): El delito informático abarca una amplia gama de actividades potencialmente ilegales. Esto implica, los crímenes en el que las redes de computadoras, dispositivos de las mismas son el objetivo o crímenes facilitados por las redes o sus dispositivos, el objetivo principal de que es independiente de la red del ordenador o dispositivo.

Ahora, partamos del punto clave y sus conflictos asociados en dimensión con la Ciber-Guerra.


-Ataques distribuidos, con un anonimato alto.
-Posibilidad de utilizar la infraestructura del mismo enemigo.
-Bajo costo de implementación tecnológica y R&D.
-Amplia gama de infraestructuras críticas para ser atacados.
-Posibilidad de realizar actividades no convencionales.
-El contacto directo con el comando del enemigo y el centro de control en los rangos más altos.

Evaluación # 1:
En las guerras tradicionales, para luchar contra un país se requiere una enorme cantidad de recursos (armas, municiones, etc.) Si bien, en Internet basados en los conflictos asimétricos, para luchar contra un país que puede tomar sólo unos pocos o sólo un hacker experto motivado.

Ciber Politicas (Historia)
2001 Pakistan vs West
2002 USA vs China
2004 South America vs USA
2007 Arab countries vs Denmark
2007 Russia vs Estonia
2008 Russia vs Georgia

Ciber Industria y Espionage Privado
2001 Pakistan vs India
2005 China vs EU (politico)
2005 China vs Italy (industrial)
2006 Russia vs USA (militar)
2008 China vs rest of the world
2009 China vs USA (guerra preventiva?)

Evaluación # 2:
-Los sistemas tácticos se descarga nada más de las veces y cuando se descarga que los datos transferidos irrealista.
-El sistema era tan lento en la distribución de la inteligencia que sabíamos acerca de la presencia del enemigo sólo cuando estaba delante de nosotros y de tiro.
-El exceso de inteligencia = nada de inteligencia!

Lecciones no aprendidas
-Alemania (ley del Parlamento contra la seguridad / herramientas de hacking).
-Francia (doctrina de Sarkozy).
-Italia (decreto Pisanu).
-Suecia (El caso de Pirate Bay).
-Todos los otros países (ceguera ante los múltiples niveles de amenazas y la ceguera a la retención excesiva de datos).

Lecciones aprendidas
Uso de software propietario y de hardware cuando sea posible. Y cuando no es posible, al menos la revisión más actual del software de código abierto.
-Excesiva retención de datos provoca más problemas que beneficios. Hay un peligro oculto desde el punto de vista social, ya que una vez adoptado y aplicada una política de retención de datos, será necesaria una revolución para revocarla (recordemos el caso del aeropuerto de Londres?).

S.A & R.M